KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MODEL PISA: ANALISIS BERDASARKAN TINGKAT ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2025v13n2a2Kata Kunci:
Adversity Quotient, Penalaran Matematis, PISAAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis dan Adversity Quotient (AQ) pada peserta didik. Penalaran matematis merupakan kemampuan penting dalam pendidikan modern yang memungkinkan peserta didik melaksanakan pengambilan Keputusan secara logis berdasarkan informasi yang ada dalam kehidupan sehari - hari. Sementara itu, Adversity Quotient mewakili kemampuan seseorang dalam menghadapi dan mengatasi rintangan. Studi ini menerapkan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif terhadap subjek penelitian yang berjumlah 36 peserta didik di kelas VII di SMP Negeri 2 Mandiraja. Data dikumpulkan melalui angket Adversity Response Profile (ARP), tes tertulis mengenai kemampuan penalaran matematis, dan wawancara terhadap subjek penelitian. Analisis terhadap data menggunakan reduksi data dari hasil tes tertulis dan wawancara, penyajian data hasil analisis dan pengambilan kesimpulan. Kemudian dianalisis menggunakan triangulasi sumber yang berdasar pada proses dalam penalaran matematis yaitu submit a conjecture, mathematical manipulation dan drawing logical conclusion. Dari hasil temuan penelitian menunjukan bahwa tingkat Adversity Quotient yang tinggi berpengaruh positif terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis. Peserta didik tipe climber dan camper memiliki kemampuan penalaran matematis yang baik, kedua tipe ini telah dapat melaksanakan submit a conjecture, mathematical manipulation dan drawing logical conclusion. Meskipun dalam prosesnya peserta didik tipe camper terkadang mengalami kesalahan dalam memahami informasi yang ada. Sebaliknya, peserta didik tipe quitter memiliki kemampuan penalaran matematis yang tergolong rendah, ditandai dengan kesalahan dalam memahami informasi yang ada sehingga menghambat proses pemecahan masalah
Unduhan
Referensi
Agustyaningrum, N., Hanggara, Y., Husna, A., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudii, A. (2019). An analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning ability on abstract algebra course. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(12), 2800–2805. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080313.
Ahmar, A. S., Rahman, A., & Mulbar, U. (2018). The analysis of students’ logical thinking ability and adversity quotient, and it is reviewed from cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012167.
Akuba, S. F., Purnamasari, D., & Firdaus, R. (2020). Pengaruh kemampuan penalaran, efikasi diri dan kemampuan memecahkan masalah terhadap penguasaan konsep matematika. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.2827.
Astuti, F. K., & Aripin, U. (2022). Student’s mathematical understanding ability on solving mathematical problems in terms of adversity quotient. JIML, 5(3), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i3.p156-164.
Beccuti, F. (2024). Meaning and subjectivity in the PISA mathematics frameworks: a sociological approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10296-z.
Budiyanti, D. S., Moeller, M. E., & Thit, A. (2022). Influence of copper treatment on bioaccumulation, survival, behavior, and fecundity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster: toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles differ from dissolved copper. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 92, 103852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2022.103852.
Dewi, S. K., & Setianingsih, R. (2025). Penalaran aljabar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) dalam menyelesaikan soal open-ended ditinjau dari adversity quotient. MATHEdunesia, 14(2), 370–380. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v14n2.p370-387.
Faradillah, A., Hadi, W., & Tsurayya, A. (2018). Pre service mathematics teachers’ reasoning ability in solving mathematical non routine problem according to cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012006.
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students’ creative mathematical reasoning ability students through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005.
Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, & Usodo, B. (2020). The role of adversity quotient in the field of education: a review of the literature on educational development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507.
Lailiyah, S., Kurlillah, F. A., & Kusaeri. (2023). Student’s ways of thinking and ways of understanding analysis in solving mathematics problems in term of adversity quotient. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 16(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v16i2.567.
Lestari, S. A. P. (2019). Mathematical reasoning ability in relations and function using the problem solving approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012065.
Muhatrom, M., Sholihah, E. P., & Sutrisno, S. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada materi bilangan bulat ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika dan Statistika, 4(2), 1258–1273. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v4i2.
Mukuka, A., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2021). Mediating effect of self efficacy on the relationship between instruction and students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.1.12508.73-92.
Nilasari, N. T., & Anggreini, D. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1342.
Nurazizah, I., & Zulkardi, Z. (2022). Students’ mathematical reasoning ability in solving PISA like mathematics problem covid 19 context. Jurnal Elemen, 8(1), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v8i1.4599.
Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2020). Designing PISA like mathematics problem relating change and relationship using physical distancing context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012004.
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (volume v): learning strategies and attitudes for life (PISA, Ed.). France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c2e44201-en.
Saleh, M., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the reasoning ability of elementary school student through the indonesian realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54.
Saregar, A., Latifah, S., & Sari, M. (2016). Efektivitas model pembelajaran cups: dampak terhadap kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi peserta didik madrasah aliyah mathla’ul anwar gisting lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.24042/jpifalbiruni.v5i2.123.
Singh, K., & Parveen, S. (2018). Impact of adversity quotient on learning behaviour among secondary school students. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(12), 1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.02247.7.
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). The most important factor iin achieving success adversity quotient turning obstacles into opportunities. United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tashtoush, M., Qasimi, A., Sheerawi, N., & AL-Shannaq, M. (2024). The effect of PISA based educational program on mathematical achievement. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 53, 195–212. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1328888.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Ratna Fertikawati, Windhy Wijayanti, Gunawan, Fitrianto Eko Subekti
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.gif)
