Kerangka Konseptual Model Pembelajaran Real Math Literacy (RML)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v7i2.58454Kata Kunci:
Kerangka Konseptual, Model Pembelajaran, Real Math LiteracyAbstrak
Salah satu kompetensi yang sangat penting di abad 21 adalah literasi matematika. Namun, pentingnya literasi matematika belum sejalan dengan prestasi peserta didik Indonesia, yakni literasi matematika peserta didik masih rendah. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah model pembelajaran yang digunakan untuk mengelola aktivitas di dalam kelas belum maksimal. Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran tentang pengembangan komponen model pembelajaran Real Math Literacy (RML) yang terdiri dari sintaks, sistem sosial, prinsip reaksi, sistem pendukung, dampak instruksional dan dampak pengiring. Model pembelajaran Real Math Literacy (RML) yang dirancang merupakan hasil analisis, elaborasi, dan sintesis dari teori-teori belajar yang relevan, komponen pokok yang mendasari literasi matematika, model discovery learning, dan assessment for learning.
Unduhan
Referensi
Aisyah, N., Hawa, S., Somakim, Purwoko, Hartono, Y., & AS, M. (2007). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.
Alimuddin. T., Layly, S., Helmi, Alimuddin, N. F. (2022). The students' numerical literacy ability in junior high schools. Kreano jurnal matematika kreatif-inovatif, 13(2), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.37541.
Amir, Z., & Risnawati. (2015). Psikologi pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.
Babys, U. (2016). Kemampuan Literasi matematis space and shape dan kemandirian siswa SMA pada discovery learning berpendekatan RME-PISA. Jurnal Pendididikan Matematika Indonesia, 1(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i2.82.
Desyandri, Muhammadi, Mansurdin, M., & Fahmi, R. (2019). Development of integrated thematic teaching material used discovery learning model in grade V elementary school. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.29210/129400.
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in teaching geometry in indonesian primary school. [PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation external, University of Twente]. University of Twente.
Gómez-Chacón, L., Molina, E., & Sánchez, M. A. (2017). Mathematics literacy in the real world. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 35(1), 39-57.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Istitute.
Hobri. (2009). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Jember: Center for Society Studies.
Ibda, F. (2015). Perkembangan kognitif: teori Jean Piageat. Intelektualita, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ji.v3i1.197
Irianto, P.O., & Febrianti, L.Y. (2017). Pentingnya penguasaan literasi bagi generasi muda dalam menghadapi MEA. Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, 1(1), 640-647.
Johar, R., & Zainabar. (2019). Student’s Performance on Shape and Space Task of PISA Question. Proceeding International Conference On Education, 449–454.
Kelana, J. B., Wardani, D. S., Firdaus, A. R., Altaftazani, D. H., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2020). The effect of STEM approach on the mathematics literacy ability of elementary school teacher education students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012006
Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). The characteristics of mathematical literacy based on students’ executive function. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.11.1.193.
Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students’ in term of gender differences. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146.
Lestari, D. (2014). Penerapan teori bruner untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran simetri lipat di kelas IV SDN 02 Makmur Jaya kabupaten Mamuju Utara. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako, 3(2), 129–141.
Mahdiansyah, & Rahmawati. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah: analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i4.158
Nurhidayati, E. (2017). Pedagogi konstruktivisme dalam praksis pendidikan Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.2
Oktaviana, Y. I., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2019). Kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA kategori formulate pada siswa kelas VIII. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n2.p400-407
Pangemanan, A. (2020). Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach on Statistics Material Against Student Results. International Education Studies, 13(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n4p1
Rahayu, D. U., Mulyono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa pada model PBL Berbantuan LMS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES.
Rangkuti, A. N. (2014). Konstruktivisme dan pembelajaran matematika. Darul Ilmi, 02(02), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.24952/di.v2i2.416
Ratumanan, T. G. (2004). Belajara dan pembelajaran. Semarang: Unesa University Press.
Sari, R.H.N. (2015). Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana?. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, UNY (pp. 713-720).
Seuring, S., Yawar, S. A., Land, A., Khalid, R. U., & Sauer, P. C. (2020). The application of theory in literature reviews – illustrated with examples from supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2020-0247.
Shiel, G., Perkins, R, Close, S, & Oldham, E. (2007). PISA mathematics: a teacher's guide. Stationery Office, Dublin.
Simamora, A. B., Widodo, W., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2020). Innovative learning model: improving the students' scientific literacy of junior high school. Jorer: International Journal of Recent Educational Education, 1(3). 271-285. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i3.55.
Torraco, R. J. (2004). Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1097.
Tsiotsou, R. H., Koles, B., Paul, J., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2022). Theory generation from literature reviews: A methodological guidance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12861.
Uno, H. B., & Satria, K. (2012). Assessement Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Westbroek, H. B., Rens, L. V., Berg, E. V. D., & F., J. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044.
Wijaya, A., Hauvel-Panhuizen, M. Van Den, & Doorman, M. (2015). Identifying ways to improve student performance on context-based mathematics tasks. CERME 9 - NinthCongress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 944–950.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
