Reconsidering Identity in Wendt’s “Anarchy Is What States Make of It”: Limits and Extensions

Authors

  • Mirah Satria Alamsyah Universitas Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/rir.v7i2.61923

Keywords:

Constructivism, State Identity, Anarchy, International Relations, Social Construct

Abstract

This article revisits Alexander Wendt’s constructivist framework on state identity and behaviour in an anarchic international system. Wendt emphasizes that anarchy is a social construct and that identities and interests shape state actions. However, his framework has limitations, particularly in explaining how identities form from the societal to the state level, and in the role of cognition and deliberation at the state level, which are essentially individual capacities. Drawing on Bruce Cronin’s insights, Oran Young’s social choice theory, Maja Zehfuss’ distinction between social and corporate identities, and critiques by Copeland and Boulding on intention interpretation, this article highlights overlooked complexities. The analysis suggests that enriching Wendt’s framework with complementary perspectives allows for a more robust understanding of identity as a key factor shaping intentions, interactions, and the meaning of anarchy, reinforcing constructivism’s relevance in international relations studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38 (1), 226-254.

Bernstein, M. (2005). Identity Politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 47-74.

Boulding, K. E. (1959). National Images and International systems. Conflict Resolution , 3 (2), 120-131.

Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society. New York: Palgrave.

Copeland, D. C. (2006). The Constructivist challenge to structural realism: A review essay. In S. Guzzini, & A. Leander, Constructivism and International Relations (pp. 1-20). New York: Routledge.

Cronin, B. (1999). Community under Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.

Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2010). Anarchy and Anarchism: Towards a Theory of Complex International Systems. Millenium-Journal of International Studies, 39 (2), 399-416.

Donnelly, J. (2015). The Discours of Anarchy in IR. International Theory, 7 (3), 393-425.

Donnelly, J. (2012). The Elements of the Structure of International Systems. International Organization, 66 (4), 609-643.

Fearon, J. D. (2018). Cooperation, Conflict and the Cost of Anarchy. International Organization, 1-37.

Havercroft, J., & Pirichard, A. (2017). Anarchy and International Relations Theory: A Reconsideration. International Political Theory, 1-15.

Lake, D. A. (1996). Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization, 50 (1), 1-33.

Lechner, S. (2017). Why Anarchy still matters for International Relations: On Theories and Things. International Political Theory, 1-20.

Mercer, J. (1995). Anarchy and Identity. International Organization, 49 (2), 229-252.

Moloney, P. (2011). Hobbes, Savagery, and International Anarchy. American Political Sciences Review, 105 (1), 189-204.

Onuf, N., & Klink, F. F. (1989). Anarchy, Authority, Rule. International Studies Quarterly, 33 (2), 149-173.

Oye, K. A. (1985). Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and strategies. World Politics, 3 (1), 1-24.

Parent, J. M., & Erikson, E. (2009). Anarchy, Hierarchy, and Order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 22 (1), 129-145.

Singer, J. D. (1994, February). The Evolution of Anarchy vs. the Evolution of Cooperation. Politics and The Life Science, pp. 26-28.

Snyder, J. (2002). Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War. International Organization, 56 (1), 7-45.

Spryut, H. (2009). Institutional Selection in International Relations: State Anarchy as Order. International Organization, 48 (4), 527-557.

Sunagami, H. (2006). Wendt, IR, and Philosophy: A Critique. In S. Guzzini, & A. Leander, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics (pp. 57-72). New York: Routledge.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Massachusets: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46 (2), 391-425.

Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing International Politics. International Security , 20 (1), 71-81.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Young, O. R. (1978). Anarchy and Social Choice: Reflections on International Polity. World Politics, 30 (2), 241-263.

Zehfuss, M. (2006). Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liason. In S. Guzzini, & A. Leander, Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and his Critics (pp. 92-116). New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Satria Alamsyah, M. (2025). Reconsidering Identity in Wendt’s “Anarchy Is What States Make of It”: Limits and Extensions. Review of International Relations (Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hubungan Internasional), 7(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.24252/rir.v7i2.61923

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.