Legal Analysis of Code of Conduct and Joint Development Agreement In the South China Sea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.63858Keywords:
China, EEZ, Ten-Dash Line, UNCLOS, South China Sea disputeAbstract
The South China Sea territorial conflict emerged following the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim over the Ten-Dash Line, which overlaps with the maritime entitlements of several coastal states, including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, and Indonesia’s Exclusive Economic Zone in the Natuna area. China bases its claim on historical grounds, a position strongly contested, particularly by the Philippines through arbitration before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2013. Despite the arbitral award, the dispute remains unresolved and continues to generate legal and political tensions. This study employs a normative legal research method to examine the legal implications of the Code of Conduct (CoC) and the Joint Development Agreement (JDA) in managing the South China Sea dispute under international law. The analysis is conducted through examination of international legal norms, principles, and relevant instruments, particularly the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The study finds that neither the CoC nor the JDA constitutes a legally binding dispute settlement mechanism. Instead, both function primarily as conflict management instruments aimed at preventing escalation and facilitating cooperation. Consequently, reliance on these mechanisms alone is insufficient to ensure certainty or resolve sovereignty disputes.
References
Adi, D. W. S. (2020). Analisis penyelesaian sengketa Laut China Selatan oleh badan arbitrase internasional. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(3), 39–51.
Akmal, and Pazli. “Strategi Indonesia Menjaga Keamanan Wilayah Perbatasan Terkait Konflik Laut Cina Selatan pada Tahun 2009–2014.” Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 2, no. 1 (2015).
Alfath, Tahegga Primananda, and Riyo Lian Nugroho. “Diplomasi Soft Power Asimetris Berbasis Sumber Daya Kelautan Lintas Batas dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 24, no. 2 (2017): 157–175.
ASEAN Secretariat. “Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.” May 14, 2012. Accessed December 18, 2025. https://asean.org/declaration-on-the-conduct-of-parties-in-the-south-china-sea-2/
Darajati, M. R., & Adolf, H. (2018). Putusan sengketa Laut China Selatan serta implikasi hukumnya terhadap negara di sekitar kawasan tersebut. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(1), 22–43.
Fitrijanti, Poppy, & Methodus. “Implikasi Putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration dalam Sengketa Laut China Selatan terhadap Kepatuhan Negara.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 49, no. 2 (2019): 259–278.
Haryanto, Agus & Arry Bainus. “Implikasi Declaration of Conduct Laut Tiongkok Selatan Tahun 2002 Terhadap Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa.” Jurnal Media Hukum 24, no. 1 (2017): 88–95. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0093.88-95
Jusoh, Sufian, Muhammad Faliq Abd Razak, and Ahmad Rizal Mohd Yusof. “Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Agreement.” Chinese Journal of International Law 22, no. 1 (March 2023): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmad014
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). “Press Release No. 11: The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China).” 12 July 2016. Accessed 18 December 2025. https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf
Rifa’i, I. J. “Ruang Lingkup Metode Penelitian Hukum.” Metodologi Penelitian Hukum 6 (2023).
Riry, Welly Angela, Efie Baadilla, Wilshen Leatemia, Vondaal Vidya Hattu, and June M. Rumalaklak. “Perjanjian Kerjasama Internasional dalam Konstruksi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia.” Balobe Law Journal 1, no. 1 (March 1, 2021): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.47268/balobe.v1i1.499
Tandungan, Edmondus Sadesto. “Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional.” Paulus Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2020): 88–104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurvairah Dwi Febrianingsih, Adel Zain Filadelfia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
- to retain copyright and grant to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
- permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal
- continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA license
- receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.
