ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SOAL KONTEKSTUAL BERDASARKAN TEORI JHON DEWEY DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2025v13n2a7Kata Kunci:
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis, Self efficacy, Gaya BelajarAbstrak
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mendeskripsikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dalam penyelesaian soal yang berbentuk kontekstual pada materi perkalian matriks dengan berdasarkan teori John Dewey, serta membandingkan tiga gaya belajar: yaitu gaya belajar visual, audio, dan kinestetik. Peneliti melakukan tes diagnostic non kognitif untuk melihat gaya belajar peserta didik dan tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, serta wawancara data diambil dari 32 peserta didik (10 visual, 7 audio dan 15 kinestetik) kelas XI Fase F di Sman 1 Sukakarya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang menggunakan metode eksploratif. Analisis data dengan menghitung rata-rata dan prosentase. Peneliti mengambil tiga peserta didik sebagai subjek , masing-masing mewakili satu gaya belajar. Hasil yang didapat menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik dengan gaya belajar kinestetik secara keseluruhan lebih tinggi dibandingkan peserta didik yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan audio. Dengan rata- rata kinestetik 13,19 (37,94%), visual 11,80 (33,94%) dan audio 9,78 (28,12%). Meskipun peserta didik memiliki gaya belajar yang bermacam-macam (visual, audio, dan kinestetik), semua peserta didik menunjukkan kemampuan yang serupa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika terkait perkalian matriks. Mereka semua mampu mengartikulasikan argumen, mengidentifikasi fakta, melakukan perhitungan, membandingkan hasil, dan menentukan strategi yang efektif.
Unduhan
Referensi
Ani, S. I., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2021). Merencanakan pemecahan masalah kontekstual: berpandu pada rumus atau konteks? Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.13344.
Ardiawan, Y., & Darma, Y. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya belajar. J-PiMat, 5(2), 925–936. https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v5i2.2885.
Caprioara, D. (2015). Problem solving-purpose and means of learning mathematics in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1859–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.332.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2015). Quantum learning: membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.
Dermawan, D. A., Siagian, P., & Sinaga, B. (2020). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem solving ability in terms of student learning styles with models problem based learning. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1607.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Diana, P., Marethi, I., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2020). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa: ditinjau dari kategori kecemasan matematik. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 4(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v4i1.2033.
Fadillah, S. (2025). Liberalism from the perspective of islamic education and its implications for the national education system. Solo Universal Journal of Islamic Education and Multiculturalism, 3(01), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.61455/sujiem.v3i01.269.
Firmaningtyas, L. A., Handayani, A. D., Katminingsih, Y., & Widodo, S. (2024). Students’ thinking process in solving math problems in terms of learning style. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(5), 244–236. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20240527.
Harmila, A., Nurhasanah, N., Tahir, M., & Oktavianty, I. (2022). Gaya belajar siswa: apakah ada hubungannya dengan hasil belajar siswa? Journal of Classroom Action Research, 4(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v4i1.1421.
Hidayat, R., & Arifin, Z. (2023). Mathematical problem solving ability in view of learning styles. SigmaMu: Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Data Science, 6(2), 101–110.
https://doi.org/10.31764/sigmamu.v6i2.13752.
Inastuti, I. G. A. S., Subarinah, S., Kurniawan, E., & Amrullah, A. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah pola bilangan ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(1), 66–80.
Ishartono, N., Faiziyah, N., Sutarni, S., Putri, A. B., Fatmasari, L. W. S., Sayuti, M., Rahmaniati, R., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). Visual, auditory, and kinesthetic students: how they solve pisa-oriented mathematics problems? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1), 012012. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/17426596/1720/1/012012/meta.
Katuuk, R. C., Sumarauw, S. J., & Pulukadang, R. J. (2024). Problem solving ability of remboken 1 middle school students in solving story problems in algebraic form based on polya’s steps. Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i1.691.
Nehra, P., & Raj, A. (2025). A correlational study of mathematical interest and problem-solving ability of male and female students of secondary level. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(07), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000131.
Nurmeidina, R., Zaqiyah, N. N., Nugroho, A. G., Andini, A., Faiziyah, N., Adnan, M. B., & Syar’i, A. (2025). Analysis of students’ problem-solving abilities in solving contextual problems of linear equations with three variables in terms of habits of mind. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 7(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23550.
Putri, N. A., Saputra, H., & Lestari, I. (2024). Analysis of mathematical problem solving ability of two variable linear equation system material in terms of learning style. Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computing, 21(1), 45–56.
https://doi.org/10.30812/jmasc.v21i1.1864.
Rahmawati, D., & Suryadi, D. (2024). Effect of implementing differentiated learning based on learning style on abilities in mathematical problem solving. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 50(3), 12–21.
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i31082.
Sarjana, K ., Hayati, L., & Wahidaturrahmi, W. (2020). Mathematical modelling and verbal abilities: How they determine students’ ability to solve mathematical word problems? Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 13(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.390.
Sari, M., & Nugroho, A. A. (2020). Students’ ability to solve story problems on systems of linear equations using John Dewey’s approach. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 1(2), 85–94.
https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v1i2.32.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryanti, S., Solikhah, B. M., Suliana, R., Pramesti, C., & Sari, A. S. L. (2024). Students’ ability to solve story problems on systems of linear equations using john dewey’s approach. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 5(1), 55–65.
Tok, S. (2013). Effects of the know-want-learn strategy on students’ mathematics achievement, anxiety and metacognitive skills. Metacognition and Learning, 8(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9101-z.
Utami, M. R. (2019). Analisis kesulitan siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita aritmatika sosial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 295–302.
Wahusna, Z., Sripatmi, J., & Kurniati, N. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif dalam memecahkan masalah teorema pythagoras ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 taliwang tahun pelajaran 2021/2022. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(4), 1002–1021.
Wahyuni, S., Prasetyo, T., & Lestari, D. (2019). Student problem solving analysis by step John Dewey reviewed from learning style. International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application, 2(3), 67–75.
https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v2i3.2154.
Yayuk, E., & Husamah, H. (2020). The difficulties of prospective elementary school teachers in item problem solving for mathematics: Polya’s steps. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665833.
Yunaeti, N., Arhasy, E. A., & Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik peserta didik menurut teori john dewey ditinjau dari gaya belajar. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v3i1.2212.
Yuni, Y., Wayoan, K. K., & Saputra, M. G. (2023). Asosiasi gaya belajar de porter & hernacki dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika (JIPM), 5(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.37729/jipm.v5i2.4928.
Zohra, M., & Lubis, M. S. (2025). The Effect of PMRI’s Approach on students’ problem-solving ability in geometry topics. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 13(1), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2025v13n1a6.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Erni Arfiatni Dewi, Rika Mulyati Mustika Sari, Iyan Rosita Dewi Nur
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.gif)
